It is often forgotten that all data can be manipulated by a biased researcher. What it worse, it can be done in either direction. The climate agenda and the massive lolly associated with it was just too tempting. So we got an updated version of snake oil and the rain dance.
The risk of bias happens to be real and even happens in obscure pathways simply because the accepted paradigm is naturally blinding. The researcher willfully and often unconsciously refuses to accept clear evidence unless a respected authority rubs his nose in it.
Thus political or corporate operators will learn of this unreliability and exploit its weakness to the point of silliness. Much of the AGW pronouncements are just that.
As I posted when this blog launched, the reality of rising CO2 is clear and the reality of a warm spell in the climate is also real. The linkage is not real and even then it was highly questionable. Today the climate has flat lined and slightly declined if anything while the proposed driver has climbed much higher. It remains unlinked.
For that reason I have largely dismissed the issue in this blog and focused back on what is truly important. That includes protocols for terraforming the Earth generally. The CO2 problem will generally disappear mostly inside the next generation, commencing with the rapid conversion to natural gas. And of course, the climate itself is due to swing back into a cooler spell. It is now in the top range of the Holocene range and looks stable there waiting for a large volcanic event to trigger a sharp collapse as I suspect drove other collapses. An alternative would be a significant current shift that takes place every thousand years, but that is several centuries away if it happens to be real.
“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda
Read more.. http://globalwarming-arclein.blogspot.ca/2012/07/un-climate-agenda-in-shambles.html?utm_source=BP_recent