1

Findings from Hoseo University Provides New Data about Arthritis (Efficacy of Turmeric Extracts and Curcumin for Alleviating the Symptoms of Joint…

Findings from Hoseo University Provides New Data about Arthritis (Efficacy of Turmeric Extracts and Curcumin for Alleviating the Symptoms of Joint Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials)

By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Clinical Trials Week — Investigators publish new report on Musculoskeletal Diseases and Conditions – Arthritis. According to news reporting originating in Asan, South Korea, by NewsRx journalists, research stated, “Although turmeric and its curcumin-enriched extracts have been used for treating arthritis, no systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been conducted to evaluate the strength of the research. We systemically evaluated all RCTs of turmeric extracts and curcumin for treating arthritis symptoms to elucidate the efficacy of curcuma for alleviating the symptoms of arthritis.”

The news reporters obtained a quote from the research from Hoseo University, “Literature searches were conducted using 12 electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Korean databases, Chinese medical databases, and Indian scientific database. Search terms used were “ turmeric,” ”curcuma,” ”curcumin,” ”arthritis,” and ”osteoarthritis.” A pain visual analogue score (PVAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used for the major outcomes of arthritis. Initial searches yielded 29 articles, of which 8 met specific selection criteria. Three among the included RCTs reported reduction of PVAS (mean difference: -2.04 [-2.85, -1.24]) with turmeric/curcumin in comparison with placebo (P <.00001), whereas metaanalysis of four studies showed a decrease of WOMAC with turmeric/curcumin treatment (mean difference: -15.36 [-26.9, -3.77]; P=.009). Furthermore, there was no significant mean difference in PVAS between turmeric/curcumin and pain medicine in meta-analysis of five studies. Eight RCTs included in the review exhibited low to moderate risk of bias. There was no publication bias in the meta-analysis.”

Read more