-
Suit: Company built ‘most dangerous’ facial recognition AI database in nation
-
There’s a Global Plan to Conserve Nature. Indigenous People Could Lead the Way.
-
Journalists Start Demanding Substack Censor its Writers: to Bar Critiques of Journalists
-
Americans are Suffering: Looking Beyond Covid-19
-
CLG Exclusive: The Great Reset: Corporate Socialism, or ‘Capitalism’ with Chinese Characteristics
-
‘Cuomo Needs to Resign’: Calls Grow for Governor’s Ouster After Sixth Accuser Claims Being ‘Groped’
-
Research reveals oldest documented site of indiscriminate mass killing
-
Woodlands and Wetlands Could be Worth More When Left to Nature Than When Farmed
-
Biden’s Neoliberal American Rescue Health Plan: Covid-19 Showed us Why we Need Single Payer
-
Lockdowns linked to rise in eating disorder symptoms
-
Bandaging the Corpse
Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns
Dear Sirs/Mesdames,
FOR THE URGENT PERSONAL ATTENTION OF: EMER COOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY
As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.
We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.
In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
As a matter of great urgency, we herewith request that the EMA provide us with responses to the following issues:
1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body [1]. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries [2]. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus [3; 4] [5]. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation [6]. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [7]. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.
Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.
There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.
In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.
This email is copied to:
Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe
Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.
Doctors and scientists can sign the open letter by emailing their name, qualifications, areas of expertise, country and any affiliations they would like to cite, to Doctors4CovidEthics@protonmail.com
Yours faithfully,
Professsor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and Thailand)
Dr Marco Chiesa MD FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist and Visiting Professor, University College London (Medical Doctor) (United Kingdom and Italy)
Dr C Stephen Frost BSc MBChB Specialist in Diagnostic Radiology, Stockholm, Sweden (Medical Doctor) (United Kingdom and Sweden)
Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson MD PhD, Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist (studied Medicine in Freiburg, Germany, speciality training for Neurology at New York University, Fellowship in Neurophysiology at Mount Sinai Medical Centre, New York City; PhD in Pharmacology with special interest in chronic low level neurotoxicology and effects of environmental factors on brain health), Medical Director, The London Neurology and Pain Clinic (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and United Kingdom)
Professor Martin Haditsch MD PhD, Specialist (Austria) in Hygiene and Microbiology, Specialist (Germany) in Microbiology, Virology, Epidemiology/Infectious Diseases, Specialist (Austria) in Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Director, TravelMedCenter, Leonding, Austria, Medical Director, Labor Hannover MVZ GmbH (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Austria and Germany)
Professor Stefan Hockertz, Professor of Toxicology and Pharmacologym, European registered Toxicologist, Specialist in Immunology and Immunotoxicology, CEO tpi consult GmbH. (Scientist) (Germany)
Dr Lissa Johnson, BSc BA(Media) MPsych(Clin) PhD, Clinical Psychologist and Behavioural Psychologist, Expertise in the social psychology of torture, atrocity, collective violence and fear propaganda, Former member Australian Psychological Society Public Interest Advisory Group (Clinical Psychologist and Behavioural Scientist) (Australia)
Professor Ulrike Kämmerer PhD, Associate Professor of Experimental Reproductive Immunology and Tumor Biology at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany, Trained molecular virologist (Diploma, PhD-Thesis) and Immunologist (Habilitation), Remains engaged in active laboratory research (Molecular Biology, Cell Biology (Scientist) (Germany)
Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD, Department of Chemistry (studied Medicine and Medical Microbiology in Germany, has taught Biochemistry since 2001 in present university in Canada; focus on Pharmacology, metabolism, biological membranes, computer programming; experimental research focus on bacterial toxins and antibiotics (Daptomycin); has written a textbook on Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Canada and Germany)
Professor Karina Reiss PhD, Professor of Biochemistry, Christian Albrecht University of Kiel, Expertise in Cell Biology, Biochemistry (Scientist) (Germany)
Professor Andreas Sönnichsen MD, Professor of General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center of Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (Medical Doctor) (Austria)
Dr Michael Yeadon BSc (Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology) PhD (Pharmacology), Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory, Pfizer Global R&D; Co-founder & CEO, Ziarco Pharma Ltd.; Independent Consultant (Scientist) (United Kingdom)
References
[1] Hassett, K. J.; Benenato, K. E.; Jacquinet, E.; Lee, A.; Woods, A.; Yuzhakov, O.; Himansu, S.; Deterling, J.; Geilich, B. M.; Ketova, T.; Mihai, C.; Lynn, A.; McFadyen, I.; Moore, M. J.; Senn, J. J.; Stanton, M. G.; Almarsson, Ö.; Ciaramella, G. and Brito, L. A.(2019).Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticles for Intramuscular Administration of mRNA Vaccines, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids 15 : 1–11.
[2] Chen, Y. Y.; Syed, A. M.; MacMillan, P.; Rocheleau, J. V. and Chan, W. C. W.(2020). Flow Rate Affects Nanoparticle Uptake into Endothelial Cells, Advanced materials 32 : 1906274.
[3] Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S. I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J. M.; Moderbacher, C. R.; Rawlings, S. A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R. S. and et al.(2020). Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals, Cell 181 : 1489–1501.e15.
[4] Nelde, A.; Bilich, T.; Heitmann, J. S.; Maringer, Y.; Salih, H. R.; Roerden, M.; Lübke, M.; Bauer, J.; Rieth, J.; Wacker, M.; Peter, A.; Hörber, S.; Traenkle, B.; Kaiser, P. D.; Rothbauer, U.; Becker, M.; Junker, D.; Krause, G.; Strengert, M.; Schneiderhan-Marra, N.; Templin, M. F.; Joos, T. O.; Kowalewski, D. J.; Stos-Zweifel, V.; Fehr, M.; Rabsteyn, A.; Mirakaj, V.; Karbach, J.; Jäger, E.; Graf, M.; Gruber, L.-C.; Rachfalski, D.; Preuß, B.; Hagelstein, I.; Märklin, M.; Bakchoul, T.; Gouttefangeas, C.; Kohlbacher, O.; Klein, R.; Stevanović, S.; Rammensee, H.-G. and Walz, J. S.(2020). SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition, Nature immunology.
[5] Sekine, T.; Perez-Potti, A.; Rivera-Ballesteros, O.; Strålin, K.; Gorin, J.-B.; Olsson, A.; Llewellyn-Lacey, S.; Kamal, H.; Bogdanovic, G.; Muschiol, S. and et al.(2020). Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19, Cell 183 : 158–168.e14.
[6] Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Fan, Z.; Dong, J.; Yuan, Z.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Y. and Hu, L.(2020). SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19, Journal of hematology & oncology 13 : 120.
[7] Lippi, G.; Plebani, M. and Henry, B. M.(2020).Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis, Clin. Chim. Acta 506 : 145–148.
[8] Grady, D. (2021). A Few Covid Vaccine Recipients Developed a Rare Blood Disorder, The New York Times, Feb. 8, 2021.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
The next neocolonial gold rush? African food systems are the ‘new oil,’ UN documents say
by Stacy Malkan
US Right to Know, March 9, 2021
https://usrtk.org/bill-gates-food-tracker/the-next- neocolonial-gold-rush-african- food-systems-are-the-new-oil- un-documents-say/
[links to sources at this URL]Planning documents for the 2021 United Nations Food Systems Summit shed new light on the agenda behind the controversial food summit that hundreds of farmers’ and human rights groups are boycotting. The groups say agribusiness interests and elite foundations are dominating the process to push through an agenda that would enable the exploitation of global food systems, and especially Africa.
The documents, including a background paper prepared for summit dialogues and a draft policy brief for the summit, bring into focus “plans for the massive industrialization of Africa’s food systems,” said Mariam Mayet, executive director of the African Centre for Biodiversity (ACB), who provided the documents to U.S. Right to Know.
The dialogues “are deaf and blind to the converging systemic crises we face today, and the drastic urgent re-think it demands,” ACB said in a statement.
Radical shift
A background paper prepared by the UN Economic Commission for Africa, the African Union Commission, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and partner groups for a regional dialogue on African food systems provides details about the plans underway. The document notes that it was issued “without formal editing and in English only owing to late submission.”
A “radical transformation shift is required,” the paper said, to move Africa “from current doldrums of significant importation of food from outside Africa.” The paper recounts the dire and worsening situation in Africa where 256 million people are suffering from hunger, and more than half the population in parts of Eastern Africa are food insecure. The Covid 19 pandemic is exacerbating inequity and exposing the vulnerability of Africa’s food system.
These dynamics are creating an imperative for African governments to create an “enabling environment through improved policies and investments in agricultural public goods, scale up digital solutions for agriculture, and develop innovative financing schemes through public-private partnerships,” the paper said.
“It is also time to put the investments where they are most needed; for example, African governments channeling millions of dollars in public support to climate-smart agriculture investments … and, strengthening use of big data to drive smarter farm-level decisions on water management, fertilizer use, deploying drought-resistant crop varieties and accessing markets.”
This agenda aligns perfectly with the plans of the agrichemical industry, the Gates Foundation and its main agricultural development program, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, which encourages African countries to pass business-friendly policies and scale up markets for patented seeds, fossil-fuel based fertilizers and other industrial inputs they say are necessary to boost food production. These groups say new technologies under development will allow for “sustainable intensification” of industrial agriculture.
The plans proposed in the documents are a “predictable recycling” of the “same false solutions … with the same narrow benefits accruing to a limited number of actors,” ACB said in its statement.
“The aims are not about transforming global relations with the well being of Africans and our ecological systems at the centre, but rather to entrench Africa firmly into global relations and developmental norms defined through colonialism and neoliberal globalisation.”
The ‘New Oil’
Parts of the UN background paper read like a sales pitch for investors and agrichemical industry products, but without providing full disclosure of the problems these products sometimes cause.
“Economies that in the last four decades prospered in Africa have done so through the exploitation of mineral wealth, especially oil and gas locally dubbed as ‘black gold,’” the paper explains. “Now, the continent is in motion with [a] rapidly fast transforming agricultural and agribusiness sector that is rapidly causing excitement as well as [a] central focus for investors and investment prioritization to shift to the ‘new oil’ set to drive the continent and offer the US$1 trillion by 2030.”
A section titled “the promise of digital and biotechnologies and the transformation of food systems,” discusses “the significant potential for capturing large economic, social and environmental payoffs from the use of biotechnology products … In West Africa, for instance, farmers can benefit significantly from the adoption of Bt cotton.”
The paper does not reference the failed Bt cotton experiment in Burkina Faso, the first country in Africa to adopt a large-scale genetically engineered crop for small farmers. Monsanto’s Bt cotton resisted insects and provided good yields, but could not deliver the same high quality as the native variety, and the country abandoned the GM crop.
The Burkina Faso story illustrates a “little-known quandary faced by genetic engineering,” Reuters reported. “For Burkina Faso’s cotton growers, GM ended up as a trade-off between quantity and quality. For Monsanto, whose $13.5 billion in revenues in 2016 were more than Burkina Faso’s GDP, it proved uneconomical to tailor the product closely to a market niche.”
A review of 20 years of data on Bt cotton in India published last year found the cotton was a poor indicator of yield trends and although it initially reduced the need for pesticides, “farmers now spend more on pesticides today than before the introduction of Bt.”
‘One Africa voice’
“Rebuilding the food systems of the world will … be conditional on wide scale deployment of relevant technologies and innovations,” according to a draft policy brief created for the summit. The document describes two webinars and an online discussion that aim to forge “One Africa Voice” toward the food summit for “key game changes needed to strengthen African agricultural research and development.”
The process was convened independently of the summit by the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa, with the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, the National Agricultural Research Systems and other research and policy groups. African food movements have not been involved in the dialogue, Mayet said.
Keys to transforming the food system, according to the policy brief, include generating “effective demand for science, technology and innovation” from smallholder farmers, and encouraging African governments to invest more resources into agricultural research “and its products i.e. technologies and innovations.”
The document notes “a need to devote more attention to the collection of data and development of capacities for analysis showing the return” on agricultural research for development and to “equitable policy formulation and implementation, ie, policies for enforcing property rights, including intellectual property rights, rewarding farmers for ecosystem services, ensuring safe and healthy diets at affordable prices.”
The dialogue “seems to represent another legitimating space for elite-consensus building which will then be presented at the UN Food Systems Summit as the ‘voice of Africa’ … However, such a voice will be far from that of the ordinary African working person,” ACB said. “Instead, it reflects the priorities of development experts aligned to the modernist, technology-driven visions of change and transformation, biotechnology companies, agribusiness, and the neoliberal, global development agenda.”
“Africa must question the meanings of productivity, and the social relations in which smallholder farmers could genuinely achieve greater productivity in relation to economic wellbeing and social and ecological justice.”
One CGIAR
The policy battles converging at the 2021 Food Systems Summit threaten “to force-feed the failed industrial food system to the public sector and world agriculture, binding governments to a corporate agenda that marginalizes farmers, civil society, social movements and agroecology,” according to a February 2020 report from the ETC Group that described the dynamics in play around the summit.
One key battle concerns the future of CGIAR, a consortium of 15 agricultural research centers with over 10,000 scientists and technicians on its payroll and nearly 800,000 crop varieties in its 11 gene banks. A Gates Foundation representative and former leader of the Syngenta Foundation are heading up a proposed restructuring plan to consolidate the network into “One CGIAR” with a single board with new agenda-setting powers.
The proposed restructuring, according to a July letter from the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems, would “reduce the autonomy of regional research agendas and reinforce the grip of the most powerful donors – many of whom are reluctant to diverge from the Green Revolution pathway.”
The process, IPES said, “appears to have been driven forward in a coercive manner, with little buy-in from the supposed beneficiaries in the global South, with insufficient diversity among the inner circle of reformers, and without due consideration of the urgently-needed paradigm shift in food systems.”
Many experts are saying a paradigm shift is necessary away from industrial agriculture and toward diversified, agroecological approaches that can address the problems and limitations of the current industrial model, including inequalities, increased poverty, malnutrition and ecosystem degradation.
In 2019, a high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition for the UN recommended supporting transitions to diversified and resilient food systems, addressing power inequalities in food systems, and investing in research systems that support agroecology as the way forward for transforming food systems.
Documents
Regional Dialogue: African Food Systems Seventh Session of the Africa Regional Forum on Sustainable Development 4 March 2021, Brazzaville, Congo Background Paper, ECA, AUC, FAO, AUDA-NEPAD, WEP, UNICEF, IFAD, AfDB, Akademiya2063, RUFORUM (2021)
Regional Dialogue: African Food Systems (agenda item 9), Thursday March 4, UN Economic and Social Council
Policy Brief, Strengthening African Agricultural Research and Development Towards an Improved Africa Food System, “One Africa Voice” towards the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit, FARA, Sub Regional Research Organizations, NARS, AFAAS, AGRA, FANRPAN
ACB Reaction to the Regional Dialogue on African Food Systems, which took place at the Seventh Session of the Africa Regional Forum on Sustainable Development, 4 March 2021
Dietary curcumin may boost brain DHA: Study
UCLA, March 5, 2021
Increased intake of curcumin could boost levels of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the brain by enhancing its conversion from other omega-3 precursors in the liver, say researchers.
The data, published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), explored the possibility that dietary intake of curcumin increases the production of DHA by influencing precursors such ALA and DPA after previous research showed that curcumin prevents reduced DHA content in the brain following brain trauma and that curcumin plus DHA had additive beneficial effects on plasticity, behaviour and brain DHA content.
“The combined supplementation with curcumin plus DHA reduced the brain content of the DHA precursor n-3 DPA, raising the question as to whether curcumin stimulates the synthesis of DHA,” noted the research team, led by senior author Dr Fernando Gomez-Pinilla from the University of California at Los Angeles.
Using a combination of in vitro cell culture tests and animal modelling, the team found that dietary curcumin has the potential to enhance the production of DHA from its precursor, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA).
“We report novel data showing that curcumin elevates DHA synthesis from omega-3 precursors in liver cells, and that in combination with dietary ALA, curcumin increases DHA content in vivo in both the liver and the brain,” said Gomez-Pinilla and colleagues. “Enzymes involved in the synthesis of DHA, FADS2 and elongase 2, were concurrently elevated, suggesting that curcumin may increase DHA content, in part, by increasing the pool of enzymes available to facilitate the conversion from either ALA or DPA,” they added.
In addition to identifying the mechanism by which dietary curcumin could increase brain levels of DHA, the US-based research team also report data that suggests dietary intake of curcumin and ALA could reduce anxiety-like behaviours.
Using rat models, the team found that supplementation with curcumin and ALA reduced anxiety-like behaviours.
“Feeding animals a combination of curcumin and ALA elevated DHA content in both the liver and the brain,” said the team. “Furthermore, elevations in brain DHA were closely associated with the reduced anxiety-like behaviour tested by EPM.”
The team also suggested that since the liver is the primary site for most of the DHA synthesis in the body; this raises the question as to whether some of the health effects of curcumin can be attributed to the synthesis of DHA.
“For example, deficient liver biosynthesis of DHA was linked to cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s patients who showed reduced expression of enzymes involved in DHA synthesis,” noted the team. “These data strongly suggest that curcumin increases the hepatic synthesis of DHA from its precursors.”
Such findings have important implications for human health and the prevention of cognitive disease, suggested the team, adding that the findings may be particularly vital for people eating a plant-based diet or who do not consume fish, a primary source of DHA.
“Taken together, these data suggest that curcumin enhances DHA synthesis, resulting in elevated brain DHA content,” the authors concluded
Can zinc levels predict COVID-19 severity?
Hospital del Mar Research Institute & Pompeu Fabra University, March 11, 2021
- A recent study examined the links between zinc levels in people hospitalized with COVID-19 and both disease progression and outcome.
- The study found that participants with low zinc levels had a 21% mortality rate compared with 5% in those with healthy zinc levels.
- The time to clinical recovery was approximately three times less in those with healthy serum zinc levels.
- The authors conclude that serum zinc levels could help predict the outcome of individuals with COVID-19.
Zinc is a trace element that is naturally present in certain foods and also available in dietary supplements. The human body requires zinc to maintain a range of biological functions.
For instance, hundreds of enzymes require zinc to function properly. It also plays a role in protein synthesis, DNA synthesis and cell division, wound healing, and immune function.
Zinc possesses an anti-inflammatory effect and has direct antiviral activity. As a result, zinc deficiency may reduce both innate and adaptive immune responses.
In people with a viral infection, such as SARS-CoV-2, the innate immune system is the body’s first-line response to prevent the virus from penetrating and replicating before the adaptive immune system develops targeted protection.
Are zinc levels a risk factor?
People with a SARS-CoV-2 infection have a broad spectrum of possible clinical outcomes ranging from asymptomatic to severe disease. Understanding the risk factors that determine COVID-19 severity is crucial in developing effective early stage treatments.
This need prompted doctors and researchers at Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, and the Pompeu Fabra University, all in Spain, to investigate the effect of zinc levels in people with severe COVID-19 on disease progression and clinical outcomes.
The scientists also examined the effect of zinc supplementation to block SARS-CoV-2 replication in the laboratory.
Dr. Robert Güerri-Fernández, a doctor at the Infectious Diseases Service of Hospital del Mar and one of the authors of the study, explains the rationale for the study:
“Zinc is an essential element for maintaining a variety of biological processes, and altering its levels causes increased susceptibility to infections and increased inflammatory response. […] zinc levels and zinc supplementation may prove useful tools to tackle the COVID-19 crisis.”
In the study, which appears in the journal Nutrients, the researchers analyzed data from 249 adults admitted to the hospital’s COVID-19 unit between March 9, 2020, and April 1, 2020. The median age of the participants was 65 years, and 51% were male.
In all, 28% of the participants required intensive care unit admission, and 9% died while in the hospital.
Improved outcomes
Approximately 23% of the participants had low serum zinc levels at admission. Participants with low zinc levels were more likely to experience severe COVID-19 and increased levels of inflammatory markers (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein).
For the participants with healthy zinc levels, the time to recovery was approximately three times less than for those with a low serum level: 8 days versus 25 days, respectively.
Individuals with low zinc levels had a significantly greater mortality rate (21%) than those in the healthy zinc group (5%).
After adjusting for differences in the participants’ age, sex, comorbidities, and disease severity, the study revealed a significant 6% decrease in mortality with every unit increase of serum zinc at admission.
Laboratory study
In a parallel laboratory experiment, the researchers demonstrated that increased zinc concentrations decreased the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.
Dr. Güerri-Fernández elaborates on the important implication of study results, “We have shown the importance of zinc levels in patients’ blood as an additional predictor of outcome in COVID-19, as well as its potential as a therapeutic tool for treatment.”
The study does have some limitations. For instance, it is observational, so it is not possible to demonstrate causality. In other words, the researchers cannot determine from the findings whether low levels of zinc increase the risk of severe COVID-19 or severe COVID-19 causes zinc to become depleted.
Also, the study is relatively small, and all of the participants came from a single center, which could limit the study’s generalizability.
Dr. Güerri-Fernández highlights the study’s importance and the need for more work:
“We, therefore, propose this variable as a new parameter to predict the evolution of patients, and we propose initiating clinical trials concerning zinc supplementation in patients with low levels admitted for COVID-19 and implementing programs to administer supplements to groups at risk of having low zinc levels to reduce the effects of the pandemic.
The gut mycobiome influences the metabolism of processed foods
New research points to a significant role for fungi to shape metabolism, including fat deposition, and metabolic hormones.
University of Alabama, March 8, 2021
Studies of the microbiome in the human gut focus mainly on bacteria. Other microbes that are also present in the gut — viruses, protists, archaea and fungi — have been largely overlooked.
New research in mice now points to a significant role for fungi in the intestine — the communities of molds and yeasts known as the mycobiome — that are the active interface between the host and their diet.
“We showed that the gut mycobiome of healthy mice was shaped by the environment, including diet, and that it significantly correlated with metabolic outcomes,” said Kent Willis, M.D., an assistant professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and co-corresponding author of the study, published in the journal Communications Biology. “Our results support a role for the gut mycobiome in host metabolic adaptation, and these results have important implications regarding the design of microbiome studies and the reproducibility of experimental studies of host metabolism.”
Willis and colleagues looked at fungi in the jejunum of the mouse small intestine, site of the most diverse fungal population in the mouse gut. They found that exposure to a processed diet, which is representative of a typical Western diet rich in purified carbohydrates, led to persistent differences in fungal communities that significantly associated with differential deposition of body mass in male mice, as compared to mice fed a standardized diet.
The researchers found that fat deposition in the liver, transcriptional adaptation of metabolically active tissues and serum metabolic biomarker levels were all linked with alterations in fungal community diversity and composition. Variations of fungi from two genera — Thermomyces and Saccharomyces — were the most strongly associated with metabolic disturbance and weight gain.
The study had an ingenious starting point. The researchers obtained genetically identical mice from four different research animal vendors. It is known that gut bacterial communities vary markedly by vendor. Similarly, the researchers found dramatically different variability by vendor for the jejunum mycobiomes, as measured by sequencing internal transcribed spacer rRNA. At baseline, mice from one of the vendors had five unique fungal genera, and mice from the other three vendors had three, two and one unique genera, respectively.
They also looked at interkingdom community composition — meaning bacteria as well as fungi — and found large baseline bacterial community differences. From this initial fungal and bacterial diversity, they then measured the effects of time and differences in diet — standardized chow versus the highly processed diet — on fungal and bacterial community composition.
The researchers also addressed a fundamental question: Are the fungal organisms detected by next-generation sequencing coming from the diet, or are they true commensal organisms that colonize and replicate in the gut? They compared sequencing of the food pellets, which contained some fungi, and the contents of the mouse jejunum to show the jejunum fungi were true commensal colonizers.
Thus, this study, led by Willis — and co-corresponding author Joseph Pierre, Ph.D., and co-first authors Tahliyah S. Mims and Qusai Al Abdallah, Ph.D., from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee — showed that variations in the relative abundance and composition of the gut mycobiome correlate with key features of host metabolism. This lays a foundation towards understanding the complex interkingdom interactions between bacteria and fungi and how they both collectively shape, and potentially contribute to, host homeostasis.
“Our results highlight the potential importance of the gut mycobiome in health, and they have implications for human and experimental metabolic studies,” Pierre said. “The implication for human microbiome studies, which often examine only bacteria and sample only fecal communities, is that the mycobiome may have unappreciated effects on microbiome-associated outcomes.”
The research was mostly done at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, where Willis was an assistant professor before joining the Division of Neonatology in the UAB Department of Pediatrics last summer.
The translational research in the Willis Lung Lab at UAB seeks to understand how such commensal fungi influence newborn physiology and disease, principally via exploring the gut-lung axis in bronchopulmonary dysplasia, a lung disease of premature newborns. The study in Communications Biology using adult animals, Willis says, helped develop models for on-going research in newborn animals.
Convincing evidence that type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of Parkinson’s
Queen Mary University (UK), March 8, 2021
Research from Queen Mary University of London has concluded that there is convincing evidence that type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of Parkinson’s disease. The same study found that there was also evidence that type 2 diabetes may contribute to faster disease progression in patients who already have Parkinson’s.
Treating people with drugs already available for type 2 diabetes may reduce the risk and slow the progression of Parkinson’s. Screening for and early treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with Parkinson’s may be advisable.
Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have produced conflicting results around the link between diabetes and the risk of Parkinson’s disease. This new study, published in the Movement Disorders Journal, used meta-analysis of observational data and meta-analysis of genetic data to evaluate the effect of type 2 diabetes on risk and progression of Parkinson’s disease.
Corresponding author Dr Alastair Noyce from Queen Mary University of London said: “This research brings together the results from many other studies to provide convincing evidence that type 2 diabetes likely affects not only Parkinson’s risk, but also Parkinson’s progression. There are many treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes, including prevention strategies, which may be re-purposed for the treatment of Parkinson’s.”
Umbrella review concludes protective effect for omega 3 against cardiovascular death
Yonsei University College of Medicine (South Korea), March 8 2021.
A review of meta-analyses of clinical trials and cohort studies published in the February 2021 issue of the European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences added more evidence to a protective effect for omega 3 fatty acid supplementation against death from cardiovascular causes.
- Choi of Yonsei University College of Medicine Korea and colleagues selected 29 articles for their review, among which 31 meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials and four meta-analyses of observational cohort studies were identified as statistically significant. The studies’ cardiovascular outcomes included cardiovascular, cardiac, and coronary events; cardiovascular, cardiac, and coronary deaths; arrhythmiaor sudden death; myocardial infarction; stroke or transient ischemic attack; postoperative atrial fibrillation; recurrent atrial fibrillation; and a composite outcome of total mortality from major cardiovascular causes.
A significantly lower risk of experiencing the composite outcome of total mortality from major cardiovascular causes was found among subjects who received omega 3 fatty acid supplements in comparison with those who did not receive the supplements. The protective association was still significant after restricting the analysis to large trials that included over 1,000 participants.
“To the best of our knowledge, an umbrella review focusing only omega 3 effects on cardiovascular outcomes has not been conducted,” Dr Choi and colleagues wrote. “In particular, in this current review study, we aimed to identify true associations between omega 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcome more strictly by excluding biases and performing subgroup analyses.”
“Our umbrella review indicates that omega 3 fatty acids supplementation reduces overall mortality from cardiovascular causes,” they concluded. “Even though a few large randomized clinical trials showed no evidence of clinical effect of omega 3 on cardiovascular outcomes, our comprehensive review study still provides a clue of clinical utility of omega 3 fatty acids supplementation.”
Study finds increased risk of death among breast cancer patients who drink sugar-sweetened soda
University of Buffalo, March 10, 2021
New research from the University at Buffalo suggests that breast cancer patients who drink sugar-sweetened beverages regularly are at increased risk for death from any cause and breast cancer in particular.
Compared to women who never or rarely drank non-diet soda, those who reported drinking non-diet soda five times or more per week had a 62% higher likelihood of dying from any causes, and were 85% more likely to die from breast cancer specifically. The findings were published online ahead of print March 2 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
Research on soda and breast cancer is fairly new, says study first author Nadia Koyratty, a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health in UB’s School of Public Health and Health Professions. Because breast cancer is so common, recommendations regarding lifestyle choices to breast cancer survivors are of considerable importance. And, despite the negative health outcomes associated with drinking soda, such as weight gain, Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, many people continue to drink sugar-sweetened sodas.
There have been only a few observational studies examining the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer mortality. “This study is one of the few that looks at the prognosis of women with breast cancer with respect to non-diet soda consumption,” Koyratty says.
Researchers assessed the relationship between sugar-sweetened soda and both all-cause and breast cancer mortality among 927 women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer, aged 35 to 79. Participants were enrolled in the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study, and followed for a median of nearly 19 years.
The study used a food frequency questionnaire to assess participants’ food and beverage intake in the 12 to 24 months prior to diagnosis of breast cancer. Of the more than 900 women diagnosed with breast cancer, 41% had died by the end of the follow-up period. Among the participants who had died, there was a higher percentage of women who reported high frequency of sugar-sweetened soda consumption compared to the women who were still living.
The associations did not change when researchers included diet soda consumption as a variable.
Why the focus on non-diet soda?
“Non-diet sodas are the highest contributors of sugar and extra calories to the diet, but they do not bring anything else that is nutritionally beneficial,” Koyratty explains. “On the other hand, teas, coffees and 100% fruit juices, unless sugars are added, are healthier beverage options because they do add to the nutritive value through antioxidants and vitamins.”
Sugar-sweetened sodas contain large quantities of sucrose and fructose, which give them the highest glycemic load compared to other foods or beverages. These higher concentrations of glucose and insulin may lead to conditions that have been associated with higher risk of breast cancer, the researchers note.
“There are more than 3.5 million breast cancer survivors alive in the U.S. today. We need to better understand the factors that affect their health,” said study senior author Jo L. Freudenheim, Ph.D., SUNY Distinguished Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health in UB’s School of Public Health and Health Professions.
“While we need more studies to confirm our findings, this study provides evidence that diet may impact longevity of women after breast cancer,” Freudenheim added.
In decision-making, biases are an unconscious tendency that are difficult to eradicate
University of Pompeu Fabra and New York University, March 10, 2021
Often, humans display biases, i.e., unconscious tendencies towards a type of decision. Despite decades of study, we are yet to discover why biases are so persistent in all types of decisions. “Biases can help us make better decisions when we use them correctly in an action that has previously given us great reward. However, in other cases, biases can play against us, such as when we repeat actions in situations when it would be better not to”, says Rubén Moreno Bote, coordinator of the UPF Theoretical and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory.
In these cases, decisions are guided by tendencies, or inclinations, that do not benefit our wellbeing. For example, playing the lottery more regularly after winning a small consolation prize is a common bias that unfortunately does not tend to improve our financial situation.
The aim of the research was to establish how biases arise in decision-making using mathematical models and neural recordings
A study led by professor Rubén Moreno Bote’s laboratory, with Grabriela Mochol, researchers at the Center for Brain and Cognition (CBC) at the UPF Department of Information and Communication Technologies (DTIC), in collaboration with the experimental laboratory of professor Roozbeh Kiani of New York University (USA), has studied how biases arise in decision-making using mathematical models and neural recordings in primates. The study was published by the authors on 26 February in the journal Current Biology.
A task dealing with the perception of visual stimuli
The experimental block of the study consisted of a visual perception task in which a monkey observed a certain stimulus, specifically moving dots. The primate had to decide whether there were more dots moving to the right or to the left. Trial after trial, the animal performed this monotonous decision-making process.
The authors found that primate developed two types of bias: a “slow” tendency to indicate right (or left) that lasted several minutes, despite not having any net tendency in the set of stimuli used, and a “fast” tendency that lasted scarcely a few seconds, resulting from the actions had just been made in the previous decision.
The neural representation of biases is similar to the neural representation of relevant information for solving a certain task
“For this research, we study how the prefrontal cortex, which is crucial in decision-making, encodes the two identified biases (slow and fast). The main result of the study shows that the neural representation of biases is similar to the neural representation of relevant information for solving a certain task. This would seem to indicate that the format in which biases and information are coded in the brain are very similar, so similar that it is difficult to distinguish them”, points out Moreno Bote, study principal investigator.
And he adds: “We still have much to understand, but the results of this research could explain why biases are so prevalent in decision-making, and why, much to our regret, they are so difficult to eradicate”.
508 Dead 297,274 Reported Injuries following COVID19 Experimental Vaccines Reported in the U.K.
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News, March 12, 2021The UK Government’s reporting system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency released their latest report today, March 11, 2021.
The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through February 28, 2021, for the two experimental COVID vaccines currently in use in the U.K. from Pfizer and AstraZeneca.
They report a total of 508 deaths and 297,274 injuries.
For the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis they report:
- 2294 Blood disorders including 1 death
- 1153 Cardiac disorders including 26 deaths
- 5 Congenital disorder
- 819 Ear disorders
- 12 Endocrine disorders
- 1398 Eye disorders
- 10,534 Gastrointestinal disorders including 12 deaths
- 28,915 General disorders including 114 deaths
- 18 Hepatic disorders
- 528 Immune system disorders
- 2059 Infections including 38 deaths
- 458 Injuries including 1 death
- 1073 Investigations
- 587 Metabolic disorders including 1 death
- 12,823 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 24 Neoplasms
- 18.059 Nervous system disorders including 17 deaths
- 34 Pregnancy conditions including 1 death
- 1409 Psychiatric disorders
- 212 Renal & urinary disorders
- 389 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 3986 Respiratory disorders including 14 deaths
- 6809 Skin disorders including 1 death
- 20 Social circumstances
- 58 Surgical & medical procedures
- 1119 Vascular disorders including 1 death
Total reactions for the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine: 227 deaths and 94,809 injuries
For the COVID-19 vaccine Oxford University/AstraZeneca analysis they report:
- 1098 Blood disorders including 1 death
- 1922 Cardiac disorders including 39 deaths
- 16 Congenital disorders
- 1217 Ear disorders
- 36 Endocrine disorders
- 2150 Eye disorders
- 22,336 Gastrointestinal disorders including 5 deaths
- 71,732 General disorders including 153 deaths
- 29 Hepatic disorders
- 542 Immune system disorders
- 3839 Infections including 38 deaths
- 916 Injuries including 1 death
- 2436 Investigations
- 2644 Metabolic disorders including 2 deaths
- 24,631 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 18 Neoplasms including 1 death
- 43,951 Nervous system disorders including 19 deaths
- 20 Pregnancy conditions
- 3554 Psychiatric disorders
- 563 Renal & urinary disorders including 1 death
- 297 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 5323 Respiratory disorders including 11 deaths
- 10,507 Skin disorders including 1 death
- 48 Social circumstances
- 151 Surgical & medical procedures including 1 death
- 1635 Vascular disorders including 3 deaths
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine Oxford University/AstraZenec vaccine:
275 deaths and 201,622 injuries For the COVID-19 vaccine brand unspecified analysis they report:
- 2 Blood disorders
- 3 Cardiac disorder including 1 death
- 8 Ear disorders
- 12 Eye disorders
- 83 Gastrointestinal disorders
- 300 General disorders including 2 deaths
- 1 Hepatic disorders
- 1 Immune system disorders
- 12 Infections including 1 death
- 5 Injuries
- 11 Investigations
- 24 Metabolic disorders
- 82 Muscle & tissue disorders
- 186 Nervous system disorders
- 24 Psychiatric disorders
- 8 Renal & urinary
- 1 Reproductive & breast disorders
- 23 Respiratory disorders including 2 deaths
- 49 Skin disorders
- 1 Social circumstances
- 7 Vascular disorders
Total reactions for the COVID-19 vaccine brand unspecified vaccines: 4 deaths and 796 injuries
The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency concludes:
The overall safety experience with both vaccines is so far as expected from the clinical trials.
Based on current experience, the expected benefits of both COVID-19 vaccines in preventing COVID-19 and its serious complications far outweigh any known side effects.
However, 9 other European countries have halted the Oxford University/AstraZeneca experimental COVID shots due to concerns about fatal blood clots.
ReplyReply allForward

